|
Introduction
Over
the past two newsletters, I have described some of the common law (law
developed by historical precedent) responsibilities owed by directors of
charitable organizations. These are directives that dictate how a director
is to behave generally. However, there are laws all over Canada that give
directors specific responsibilities in specific circumstances. This
newsletter will outline some of the more common statutory responsibilities
common to directors of charitable and not-for-profit organizations.
As
regular readers of this newsletter would have noticed, it has been
sometime since my last newsletter. I usually publish an issue every 6 – 8
weeks, unfortunately, it has been considerably longer than that since my
last newsletter. While certainly no excuse, part of the reason for the
delay is the time spent on bringing a new website online (see
www.aptlaw.com or
www.charitytaxlaw.ca), I would appreciate any comments on the website
you may have. For those of you who have missed reading the newsletter, I
will endeavor to keep a more regular schedule.
As
always, please remember that this newsletter is for informative purposes
only and if you have any specific questions or comments about the items
below or any other aspect of charity law, please contact me.
Adam
Director’s Statutory Responsibilities
Many
federal and provincial statutes impose liability for the activities of a
corporation on its directors. Many, if not most, make no distinction as to
whether the corporation is for, or not-for, profit. For example, if a
charitable or not-for-profit corporation were to breach the Criminal
Code provisions for criminal breach of trust or gross negligence in
workplace safety the directors of the organization could be charged
criminally. Directors could also bear responsibility for breaching the
provisions of the Excise Tax Act (GST), the Canada Pension Plan
Act, the Employee Insurance Act, and the various Employment
Standards acts, provincial Sales Tax Acts, Workplace Safety Acts, and
Pension Benefits acts across the provinces. (It should go without saying
that if an organization is not incorporated those running the organization
are responsible for their actions taken in the name of the organization).
Generally, laws apply to members of society (including corporations and
unincorporated organizations) because they help govern the relationship
between different members. Directors, as the operating mind of the
corporation, are ultimately responsible for the actions of the corporation
and their own actions if the corporation breaks the law. However, there
are also duties imposed upon the directors of charities specifically
because charities occupy a special place in society. Unlike a for-profit
corporation, a charity exists to aid third party people or causes and
therefore directors bear an even higher degree of responsibility to ensure
that the charity acts on its charitable objects and in a proper fashion.
Laws of Particular Interest
The
Income Tax Act imposes a variety of duties on directors. Some, such as
the responsibility of directors for the remittance of employee income tax,
or signing a false tax return on behalf of the corporation apply to
directors of every type of corporation. Others apply only to directors of
charities, such as if a charity fails to comply with the numerous
reporting requirements (such as the annual T3010 form or tax receipts) or
if the director accepts any benefit from his or her role as a director of
the charity.
Of
particular note is the Anti-Terrorism Act, which has a special
impact on any charity, fundraiser or donor involved with raising money for
what the Act would consider a terrorist group. Directors of a charity
accused of violating this Act run the risk of Criminal Code charges and
the charity could have its property seized and lose its charitable status.
In Ontario, directors are also subject to the
Charities Accounting Act, which allows the Office of the Public
Guardian and Trustee to call directors to account for improper use of
charitable property as well as its fundraising practices and the mingling
of donor-restricted funds. Finally, as outlined in a previous newsletter
there are a variety of statutes which concern themselves exclusively with
fundraising in different parts of the country.
Directors are not held to the standard of
perfection, the law allows for the fact that reasonable people can make
honest mistakes. However, a director is likely to be found liable (or
guilty) where the director does not exercise due diligence in the
circumstances. In the context of some statutes that may mean simply paying
attention at meetings or hiring the appropriate professional advice. Other
statutes may require you to go on record as opposing an illegal action.
|